My colleagues at the Sammis Law
Firm in Tampa, Florida alerted me to this practice by the
Hillsborough County (FL) Sheriff's Office. It appears that the sheriffs took on a new role as legal advisors for their arrestees by handing out this
flyer.
While nothing in the flyer is wrong, it’s incomplete and
does not explain to the arrestee all of their legal options and secondary
ramifications of electing to waive a formal review of the license suspension.
And since when are police authorized to deliver legal advice to their prisoners?
What's Missing from This Notice?
It says nothing about the downside to electing to waive the
formal review hearing. Waiving the Formal Review Hearing will result in a
suspension for 6 months for a breath test over .08% and one year for a first
refusal to submit to a chemical test.
It says nothing about the fact that this suspension will
appear on your Florida driving record and could affect employment and insurance
coverage. Some companies will treat the suspension as if it were a DUI
conviction (which it's not) and not renew coverage.
It says nothing about the right to a formal review hearing
to contest the legality of the suspension and that obtaining the business
permit right now will toss that right in the garbage.
What Do You Give Up?
The Formal Review Hearing is a valuable discovery tool. The
Bureau of Administrative Reviews will let us copy their entire file of police
reports and breath testing/refusal. This gets me a leg up on prosecutors who
won't see these documents for weeks. I also get to subpoena and take sworn
statements of the police officers involved affording us a great opportunity for
impeachment at a later time.
Since When Are Police Allowed to Dispense Legal Advice?
When my clients ask the police at the breath testing
facility if they should take the breath test, the police invariably advise that
they can't offer an opinion or give them advice. They tell my clients that if
they refuse, their license will be suspended, which is all the law requires of
them.
If a paralegal in my office were to give specific and
material advice to a client about a legal matter, they might be subject
to laws relating to the unauthorized practice of law. In these
cases, the police are an adverse party who should steer clear of any advice or
acts which could affect valuable legal rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment